Double-dipping with industry investment; a bully is rehired; organized crime scholar charged with money laundering – Retraction Watch
Before we provide this week’s Weekend Reads, a query: Do you experience our weekly roundup? If so, lets actually use your assist. Would you believe a tax-deductible donation to reinforce Weekend Reads, and our day-to-day paintings? Thanks upfront.
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
Here’s what used to be taking place in different places:
- “A Science investigation has proven that he, like greater than one-third of the 182 scientific scientist ambassadors whose years of participation may well be decided, broke this system’s laws towards sure sorts of industry investment.”
- “The case of a UW-Madison professor who bullied scholars operating in his lab and is scheduled to go back to paintings after a two-year suspension has some scholars and personnel on campus wondering whether or not the professor’s tenured standing afforded him a lighter punishment.”
- “A Miami professor who’s knowledgeable on drug trafficking and organized crime used to be charged by means of the U.S. with laundering money from Venezuela,” Bloomberg stories.
- “Science prevailing over politics: That’s how a researcher who used to be snubbed for a high-profile award previous this 12 months has characterised the resolution to after all acknowledge his achievements.”
- “The medical literature is riddled with unhealthy charts and graphs, resulting in false impression and worse.”
- “[S]cience should depend on validity of arguments and data, not on numbers of voters.” Tom Hardwicke and John Ioannidis surveyed those that signed the “retire statistical significance” petition. Here are their effects, with a reaction.
- “I don’t know who to inform when unhealthy issues occur.”
- “Many radiation biology research, then again, lack good enough reporting of irradiation technique, which makes replication tricky.”
- “This is what we teach our students that science should look like,” she says, “however till lately, it virtually by no means in reality seemed that means, a minimum of in my nook of science.”
- How many authors on Google Scholar are “manlocked?” And what does the time period imply? Lior Pachter explains.
- “Over the years, then again, the definition of schooling data has transform one thing that’s extra loosely outlined and faculties use it to stop pupil reporters from reporting on any occasions that occur on the faculty that college officers don’t wish to get out to the general public.” That has surely been our enjoy with FERPA.
- “New analysis blows the lid on China’s declare to have stopped the use of prisoners and teams comparable to Falun Gong for organ donation, discovering that China seems to have systematically falsified its professional information.”
- Some suppose that “plagiarism is only an error but not misconduct,” and “One concern is perpetuating these views in mentor/mentee relationships.” What a survey of 25,00zero PhD holders in Brazil unearths.
- Thompson Rivers University breached instructional freedom once they punished a predatory magazine critic, says a document. Background right here.
- “[A] handful of European establishments have informed Nature that they’ve now employed exterior corporations or devoted in-house mavens to test analysis manuscripts.”
- “Virtually each time JAMA publishes a piece of writing at the results of air pollution or local weather exchange on well being, the magazine straight away receives calls for from critics to retract the thing for more than a few causes.”
- “The recreation revolves across the participant touring via Lycoming College and defeating ‘plagiarism goblins’ by means of as it should be answering questions on plagiarism.”
- “Why do a little different funders and scholarly publishers nonetheless permit researchers to counsel reviewers to guage their paintings?”
- From the archives: “The writer discussed that it used to be a non voluntary mistake and asked fast erasal [sic] of the paper.”
- “Pre-specification of research design, results, and analytic selections are just right medical apply. Deviations from such plans will have to be faithfully reported for transparency and interpretation.”
- “Serbian Finance Minister Sinisa Mali…plagiarised his PhD thesis, the Professional Ethics Committee of the University of Belgrade dominated.”
- A pores and skin most cancers physician is “in hot water” after having two papers retracted.
- After a scandal that resulted in tragedy, “Whatever took place to the STAP mobile scientists together with Haruko Obokata?”
- “The Chinese Academy of Engineering is investigating the president of a main college over claims that instructional papers he supervised can have questionable information.”
- “Why have interaction with preprints?”
- Junior researchers the use of a new device had been “much more likely to come across insufficient reporting in RCTs than the standard peer evaluate processes utilized by journals.”
- “How to arrange a multi-author megapaper.”
- Bradley Fikes, a loved science creator on the San Diego Union-Tribune, has died on the age of 61. Fikes had a actual sense of surprise about science, however he additionally knew how to determine what used to be true and what wasn’t. An instance: His reporting led the San Diego VA to right kind a press liberate in 2015. RIP.
Like Retraction Watch? You could make a tax-deductible contribution to reinforce our paintings, observe us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, upload us in your RSS reader, or subscribe to our day-to-day digest. If you in finding a retraction that’s no longer in our database, you’ll tell us right here. For feedback or comments, e-mail us at [email protected].