Guido van Rossum Explains How Python Makes Thinking in Code Easier
They additionally write that the language’s recently-retired author Guido van Rossum “thinks Python may be closer to our visual understanding of the structures that we are representing in code than other languages.”
“While I was researching my book, CODERS,” says creator Clive Thompson, “I talked to a lot of developers who absolutely love Python. Nearly all said something like âPython is beautiful.’ They loved its readability — they found that it was far easier to glance at Python code and see its intent. Shorn of curly brackets, indented in elegant visual shelves, anything written in Python really looks like modern poetry.” They additionally in finding that Python is amusing to write down, which is extra necessary than it will appear. As Thompson writes, “When you meet a coder, you’re meeting someone whose core daily experience is of unending failure and grinding frustration.”
Building the concern of the programmer’s time into the language has had a curious impact at the group that is grown round it. There’s a social philosophy that flows out of Python in phrases of the programmer’s accountability to write down techniques for people. There’s an implicit advice, very a lot supported through Van Rossum in the tactics he talks and writes about Python, to take slightly extra time in order to make your code extra interpretable to any individual else in the long run. Expressing your recognize for others and their time throughout the high quality of your paintings is an ethos that Van Rossum has stealthily propagated in the arena. “You primarily write your code to communicate with other coders, and, to a lesser extent, to impose your will on the computer,” he says…
Part of the long-lasting enchantment of Python is the optimism and humility of beginning over. “If you’ve invested much more time into writing and debugging code, you’re much less eager to throw it all away and start over.” Co-founder and CEO, Drew Houston wrote the primary prototype of Dropbox in Python on a five-hour bus journey from Boston to New York. “The early prototypes of Dropbox were thrown away, largely, many times,” says Van Rossum….
What has he taken clear of his thirty 12 months adventure with Python? “I have learned that you can’t do it alone, which is not an easy lesson for me. I’ve learned that you don’t always get the outcome that you went for, but maybe the outcome you get is just as good, or better.”
Though twenty years in the past van Rossum had attempted a short-lived challenge referred to as Computer Programming four Everybody (or CP4E), he now says “I’m not so sure that it needs to happen anymore. I think computers have made it to that point, where they’re just a useful thing that not everybody needs to know what goes on inside.”
Long-time Slashdot reader theodp additionally flagged van Rossum’s remarks that “there are specific introductions to programming which can be amusing for children to do, however they are no longer amusing for all children, and I don’t believe I’d need to make it a compulsory a part of the curriculum.”