Political science prof up to five retractions after she “carelessly uses parts of diverse sources” – Retraction Watch
A professor of political science on the University of Porto in Portugal has had a minimum of five papers retracted for plagiarism.
Cierco’s spaces of analysis come with Kosovo, Macedonia, and Timor-Leste. The retractions, for papers revealed in 2013 and 2014, started in 2013, with 3 taking place this 12 months.
Cierco has now not spoke back to our request for remark.
Enter Michael Dougherty
The most up-to-date retractions — from the Journal of Contemporary European Studies and European Foreign Affairs Review — got here after Michael Dougherty, a professor at Ohio Dominican University who has develop into a pressure in plagiarism detection, approached more than a few journals about 13 other papers.
In August, Dougherty wrote to Martin Bull, the editor of the Journal of Contemporary European Studies, that:
The quotations attributed to fieldwork interviews within the 2013 article performed via Prof. Cierco correspond verbatim or near-verbatim to non-fieldwork sentences revealed in a 2011 European Union learn about. As the sentences seem in that supply paintings, on the other hand, they don’t seem to be offered as interview information however simply as scholarly research. Prof. Cierco has now not simplest it seems that shaped fieldwork quotations from the textual content of the learn about, however she seems to have plagiarized the encompassing dialogue. In addition to suspected information fraud there may be suspected educational plagiarism.
Earlier this month, Bull and Elizabeth Walker, Global Head of Portfolio, Area Studies Journals, Taylor & Francis, which publishes the magazine, wrote to Dougherty:
After cautious attention of all related knowledge, together with responses from the creator to the Publisher, CrossRef similarity test stories at the article, and session with an unbiased professional who evaluated the related subject matter, the editors have discovered that the thing accommodates a large number of and long passages that both constitute verbatim copies of somebody else’s paintings, or which paraphrase supply subject matter with simplest minor alterations with out being known as such.
In two circumstances known via Dougherty — one with the lend a hand of his undergraduate honors scholars — publishers of books that incorporated plagiarizing chapters via Cierco mentioned they might merely take the books out of print. Cierco is editor of one of the books, The European Neighbourhood: Challenges and Opportunities (Routledge 2016).
Dougherty instructed Retraction Watch:
I’m dissatisfied that the publishers of the 2 books don’t seem to be issuing formal retractions, however as a substitute are simply placing the books out of print. Silently pulling the books isn’t a correct correction of the scholarly document. I instructed the publishers that the suitable factor to do is to factor a web based retraction that may be registered at the Retraction Watch Database.
Like Retraction Watch? You could make a tax-deductible contribution to make stronger our paintings, apply us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, upload us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our day-to-day digest. If you discover a retraction that’s now not in our database, you’ll tell us right here. For feedback or comments, electronic mail us at [email protected].