The Great .ORG Heist – Slashdot
Sam Klein: Ethos Capital, a brand new business funding company based previously few months in Boston, has 2 team of workers and just one main funding: a deal to procure the 501c3 non-benefit that these days runs the .org area (valued at a couple of $B), for an undisclosed sum. This used to be initiated instantly after ICANN made up our minds in May, over virtually common opposition, to take away the cost cap on .org registrations without a significant worth protections for present or long run registrants. This turns out to violate a spread of moral, ICANN, ISOC, and non-benefit pointers. It is indubitably the privatisation of a no longer-for-benefit monopoly right into a for-benefit one, which can get advantages ISOC and a couple of folks by way of inconveniencing tens of millions of others. I’ve questions:
1. Do affected events have recourse?
2. Other than well mannered letters, is the rest being achieved? (Maybe: Official lawsuits were filed, however do not be expecting effects.)
three. Georgia Tech’s Internet Governance Project has pointed concepts for ICANN. (You can .. sign up for ISOC as a member to participate in long run selections.)
four. Has someone these days at ICANN + ISOC made substantive remark? (Yes: Richard Barnes, ISOC trustee and netizen, explains why he voted to promote .org.) Vint Cerf stated: ‘Hard to believe $60/yr could be a deal breaker for even small non-income.’)
five. How did we achieve the purpose of Net pioneers embracing 95% benefit margins? Tim Berners-Lee provides, “I’m very concerned about the sale of .org to a private company. If the Public Interest Registry ends up not being required to act in the public interest, it would be a travesty. We need an urgent explanation.”